The rise of the ‘hatecrasher’

September 9, 2012 at 2:32 am | Posted in Security | 5 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Young. Strong. Spiteful. Vicious. Terrifying.

When it comes to gatecrashers, I’ve seen it all. But now I’m witnessing a new level of violence – fuelled by a blind, searing hatred of everyone and everything.

This disturbing shift is so pronounced, I’m calling these intruders ‘hatecrashers’. This word isn’t in any dictionary. But if we don’t do something now to address this turn for the worse, it’s a word that’ll become all too familiar.

Four on the floor

In the last month, my staff and I handled four 16th birthday parties gatecrashed by thugs eager to injure people and damage property. Had we not controlled these events, both would have happened.

Note that these were ‘dry’ events. Hatecrashers even crash parties where alcohol is not available.

School of (very) hard knocks

When kids go gatecrashing, it’s obvious their parents have no idea where they are. I see the same kids cropping up. And I know they go to some prestigious local schools.

These private schools have huge fees … but for what? I wonder what their families would think of their precious boys as ten of them:

  • Smash a gate to splinters.
  • Make a huge racket hammering a back fence.
  • Wake and terrify elderly neighbours by pounding on their metal garage.

I saw them do all this and more.

There goes the neighbourhood

At another party, my crew worked to secure a smashed back fence while hatecrashers pelted them with bottles, garden stakes, log seats and whatever else they could get their hands on.

In most situations, we don’t know if these streetwise thugs have weapons. While we take every precaution, Police back-up is invariably hard to raise on busy weekends.

Neighbours are suffering and becoming extremely distressed. One rang me to say she was home with three young children and too petrified to move. Another neighbour, also too scared to go outside, messaged me to protest the deafening noise and smashed bottles beyond her bedroom window.

Not a parent in sight

The last party had 140 guests and 25 gatecrashers. Five sneaked in via the back while 20 more hit the front. I’m thankful my experienced staff have the expertise to deal with such unpredictable and volatile situations.

Hatecrashers are not shy, skinny types. Most are two metres tall (or more) and seem to have a ready supply of steroids.

They also have backpacks, hoodies and very likely weapons. They abuse security staff, disrespect parents and destroy all property – inside and out.

When the Police finally arrived at this fracas, they stopped some of these kids and called their parents.

Not one parent picked up the phone.

Not one of these modern-day hoods was charged with anything.

Wrong crowd

I know for a fact that two gatecrasher gangs prowl Melbourne’s leafy eastern suburbs.

Areas like Malvern, Armadale, Kew, Box Hill North, Burwood and Camberwell are beautiful by day. But if you’re having a teen party, brace yourself for hatecrashers.

Many parents think event security means putting the biggest, ugliest adult out the front. Such traits are no match for a gang of super-fit youths with knives.

These days you need adequate planning, plenty of responsible parents and professional party security.

Horror movie

The video above is a compilation of recent gatecrasher activity.

Sadly, I expect to have more footage, very soon.

Yet if we could legislate to control teen events, our children could party safely.

And the destructive morons could be charged with the new offence of ‘Gatecrasher’.

Read my proposal to see what I mean.

Naomi Oakley, Founder, Safe Partying Australia.

Further reading: http://stonnington-leader.whereilive.com.au/news/story/stonnington-parents-warned-to-plan-ahead-for-safe-teen-parties/

All the Wrong Moves

March 17, 2011 at 5:16 am | Posted in Security | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

safe teen parties security crowd control
There’s a right way and a wrong way.
The wrong way costs MUCH more.

Girl Talk

A young girl rang and asked if I could provide crowd control for an after-formal party for 400 teens in an inner-Melbourne factory area.

She couldn’t believe I was concerned when she told me:

  • The school didn’t want to know about it. (No kidding!)
  • Only two parents would assist … then leave after just one hour.
  • It was BYO alcohol (and everything else) as they couldn’t be bothered sorting this out.
  • The average guest age was 16. 
  • Police hadn’t been notified. (I wonder why?)

Father Knows Best?

Having planned and worked at 600 teen parties, I know how to do pre-party assessments for parents.

These include making the venue safe, preventing unwanted guests and planning for risks, alcohol and transport.

A father decided that, despite my vast experience, he didn’t want any restrictions on his son’s 18th birthday (or his 60 teenage guests).

He ‘knew them all’; they were ‘good kids’. Yet he did ask if my staff would break up any fights.

Not on my watch! I provide a safe environment for my staff and the people they protect.

This is called:

DUTY.

OF.

CARE!

Write it down, before it bites you on the bum.

Begging for Trouble

A young man asked me to provide security for 350 16-year-olds in the western suburbs. Once again, just two parents home, unrestricted alcohol and not a word to the cops.

Recipe for disaster doesn’t begin to cover this.

Out of Her Mind

A mother asked me about security for a teenage party:

  • 50 kids? Yep.
  • Eastern suburbs? Yep.
  • Alcohol? Not restricted.
  • Parents? Nup.

WHAT?!

The mother was going overseas that weekend, leaving her teen to party with 50 others in her house. Pity her neighbour! Yet she whinged about a recent party that had deposited underwear and empty booze bottles in her yard!

Are you getting this?!

Crash & Burn

Two distressed mothers enquired about crowd control for their teens’ birthday. Their kids had been at the same party a few weeks ago. This party had parents ‘doing security’ -thinking anyone can perform this demanding and difficult job.

Two hours in, 20 gatecrashers arrived, started a brawl, injured guests and ended the event.

The birthday boy was shattered that he couldn’t celebrate his special day.

The Usual Suspects

All this happened in the last few weeks. The usual common elements are:

Alcohol control.  If you don’t restrict grog, guests will fight, vomit or pass out. If not this time, then the next. Your luck will run out.

Police notification.  It’s extremely stressful for police to attend an event they know nothing about. Do the right thing and inform them. You may need them more than you could ever imagine.

Duty of care.  If you don’t provide a safe environment for guests and neighbours, you could be liable. Think before you plan a party and ensure parents are there to assist.

I’ll cover social media in detail soon. For now, do NOT promote any event on social networking spaces unless you want it to end in anti-social behaviour!

I’m not the party police, but I do know how to ensure everyone has a great time at yours.

Ignore these warnings at your (considerable) peril.

Naomi Oakley, Founder, Safe Partying Australia.

Why Crowd Control Works at Parties

September 13, 2010 at 9:01 am | Posted in Security | 1 Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Male and female crowd controllers are far more effective than burly, blokey bouncers alone.

Saturday night’s party showed why crowd control is a delicate and volatile yet necessary affair. 

At 9.30 pm I spotted four males sitting on a fence, six houses up from my client’s. All were drinking and using their mobile phones. 

In my experience, when people hang round like this, it’s time to disperse and move them on to minimise the risk of gatecrashers. 

I rang local police and said that: 

  • They already had my written notification of the party.
  • We had potential gatecrashers.
  • We’d really appreciate a police van drive-by.

The policeman said the van was tied up and he didn’t know when it’d be free. 

I warned the parents, who took station in front of their home to deter the threat. 

Twenty minutes later the gatecrashers came up the driveway – intoxicated and aged 15-17. 

I recognised one boy (from a very-well-known private school) and noted his name for possible future use. 

Yet again, these kids had seen the party on Facebook. Though none of their names was on the guest list, they wanted in. 

When this didn’t happen, they became agitated and abused the parents and my security staff. They refused to leave the area, saying they had plenty of booze to stay and create their own party. 

I called police again to repeat my request. The van was still tied up, but the member offered to call 000 for me. 

I knew it was better that he rang, as police get priority and can often speak to radio operators directly. 

But still no van appeared. 

We now had a situation that could go either way. 

  • We didn’t know if the gatecrashers were armed.
  • They were aggressively targeting my male staff member.
  • The parents were annoyed and stressing that we didn’t have police back-up.

We needed a tactical shift. So, drawing on my policing expertise, I took over the situation. 

I talked to the gatecrashers for half an hour, managed to build rapport with them and finally got them to leave. 

Once again, having access to both male and female crowd control dynamics did the trick. 

I later learned that a huge police operation in the CBD had drained suburban resources. 

This had been a great success, but it did leave local homes vulnerable. 

In these trying times, most will agree that more police resources would be a good thing. 

When it comes to parties, police presence is particularly important between 9 and 11 pm. 

Most times, a simple drive-by is all you need to nip serious trouble in the bud. 

Epilogue

Here’s what my client wrote to me after the party: 

‘Hi Naomi, sorry I didn’t get a chance to say goodbye and thank you so much.  

I will be writing a letter to our local police station verbalising my disappointment in the response we received, considering we had done everything possible to avoid any problems by having a safe party plan and by following all your recommendations, and then to be let down by the police with something that was out of our control.  

Your negotiating skills are innumerable and your experience certainly shows through in how you manage people.  

I just am so grateful for all your work.  Cheers, L.’ 

So there you go. Even the hardest night can have a happy ending – so long as you know what you’re doing! :)  

Naomi Oakley, Managing Director, U-NOME Security Communication Specialists. 

Business Blogs

School of Thought

May 19, 2010 at 12:08 am | Posted in Security | 2 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Picture of health? Fast forward: 6 drinks + 3 am + 150 boys + 0 adults + 50 km from home = ?

Long Way Home

Recently I was contacted by a VCE (Year 12) teenager who was planning a celebration for after her formal (prom night).

The event was for 300 students. The venue was in the city: 50 km from the outer eastern suburb in which these kids lived!

I asked the teen why she and her friends would travel so far to celebrate. 

She explained that not many venues wanted to accommodate this type of event. 

I asked how many underage kids were attending.

She said half. 

In addition to the legalities of children at a licensed venue, I wondered how many teachers and adults were assisting.

She replied zero!

Before & After

I’ve done plenty of ‘after parties’. And they sure don’t resemble their Hollywood counterparts.

The last one was in a private house:

  • No security.
  • Teens staggering around intoxicated.
  • Young girls with minimal clothing.
  • Some with underwear round their ankles.
  • Fights.

The kids had also trashed some local shops.  Three police units attended.  Parents were present, but did nothing. Too busy enjoying themselves.

Secondary schools (colleges) can no longer ignore students who plan and attend post-formal events. 

Schools are accountable.

These kids are from your school. 

You must be proactive and help plan these events.

Otherwise, it’ll come back to haunt you as the next tragedy unfolds. 

Naomi Oakley, Managing Director, U-NOME Security Communication Specialists.

Business Blogs

Hard Day’s Night

January 17, 2010 at 10:44 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Alcohol in, brains out. And not a parent in sight! Photo by FlySi.

The party we covered last night was hard work. First we had to remove four invited guests who’d assaulted someone inside. These guys had been drinking before entering the house.

As we took them out, they threatened us. One said he had a knife; another mentioned a syringe. All four had their hands in their pockets.

Suddenly, one guy punched my staff member in the face while another lunged towards me, hands raised, as if about to assault me too.

As we restrained them and ejected them from the premises, they threatened to come back with 20 more guys. An hour later, they did. We observed them loitering about ten houses away. Fortunately, they didn’t try to enter the party.

This group (aged 13 to 17) began intimidating innocent passers by. One young teenager told me they’d hit someone on the head with a beer bottle.

Then fighting broke out all over the street. Cars had to stop or swerve to avoid hitting bodies. I watched and wondered who’d get hurt and how many vehicles would be damaged.

Twenty minutes later, the local police arrived and made their presence felt. All things considered, they achieved a reasonable result from a very bad situation.

I’m sure the neighbours were terrified. Only when the fighters eventually dispersed did some property owners venture out.

It was amazing: a place so nice during the day turned evil at night. I’ve worked hundreds of events in all different areas, but this one was a shocker – like a disaster movie!

When I spoke with the police, they attributed the area’s problem to a mix of private and public schools and an influx of gangs.

My question is: where do these kids’ parents think they are? It’s just not good enough to blindly accept that little Tommy is ‘going over to someone’s house’.

I firmly believe parents should ask more questions and keep tabs on their children.

Do you agree?

Naomi Oakley, Managing Director, U-NOME Security Communication Specialists.

Business Blogs

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.